Click here for my post on The Best Spinner

Jan
16

SEO is NOT a Jungle in 2012

By · Comments (16)

I went to an SEO conference yesterday.

And although I didn’t learn a huge amount of tactics, it did help me define my SEO strategy

- or perhaps a philosophy -

which I thought you may find useful for me to share.

There seems to be a massive oxymoron in SEO.

On the one hand, Google says that we shouldn’t artificially create links.

On the other hand, gaining links to your website are definitely one of the top 2 factors which will decide on where you are positioned in the search engines.

So, how do we build links, where any linkbuilding is in itself artificial?!

It was very interesting to hear from people outside of our internet marketing commmunity – some of whom are really on the cutting edge of SEO.

These are people who are working in leading international SEO companies who are dealing with extremely high profile clients.

They are running 100s of tests daily to see what is working and what is not working.

IMHO, a far cut above from the internet marketing community whose ‘new’ advice is the next best place where you can get links.

I will definitely share more in a future blog post, but here are some things which came out at the conference and which I believe are true:

1. You can be penalised for incoming links

Many people counteract this arguement by saying that if this were the case, then you could harm your competitor by linking to them from bad neighbourhoods.

Well, um…yeah.

It also seems to be the case, that Google looks at your links as a whole, so if you have 1k bad links and 1k good links, then the good links will be devalued by the bad links.

Think about that when you do your next Xrumer or Scrapebox campaign :)

2. Social factors are being used more and more to determine search position

I don’t think that anyone would argue with this. However, it seems that it is actually becoming a MAJOR (with a capital M) factor and if you are not using it, then you are missing out.

Although, I hate to blow my own trumpet, this is exactly what my message was about 6 months ago when I came out with Instant Profit Booster which was my course on exactly how I am doing that.

3. Some of your pages can affect the rest of your site

It sounds kind of obvious when I say this, however it is not something which I had thought of before.

But what does this mean in practice?

What it means is, that if you have some low quality pages, then they can give a negative effect to your whole site. So in many cases, it may be better to actually eliminate lower quality pages in order to bring the quality of your whole site up.

Call it trust score.

Call it quality score.

Comes down to the same thing…

4. Google does know… :)

I think that this is a massively important thing to remember. They know what we are doing on the internet in terms of backlinking.

They have 100s of engineers working on the internet and 1000s of people around the world manually checking sites and feeding back any obvious patterns to the algorithm.

There are some things which you will get away with either in the short term or the long term though.

But you won’t really know that unless you are testing ‘doing it’ and not just ‘doing it’.

There is an easy way to keep Google happy and that really is to pay attention to delivering what visitors want.

5. Different niches should be treated differently. Not only in the force of your linkbuilding, but also in how you should be doing your linkbuilding.

A massively easy way to know what is working for your niche is to look at your competitors.

6. There seems to be some arguement on how powerful long tail keywords are.

As a reminder, 30% of keyword phrases searched are either search for the first time or haven’t been search for in the last 90 days (usually misquoted without the last bit!)

On one hand, if someone is searching for:

large blue widgets

they may be better served by going to a site which is specifically about large blue widgets.

On the other hand, it is also likely that a site about blue widgets will also discuss both large and small blue widgets and therefore will be able to supply the information.

As a sidenote, when creating content for your site, do you think that Google genuinely wants you to have 3 separate pages for:

cheap halloween costumes
low cost halloween costumes
halloween costumes that are cheap

Generally, all three pages will have identical information on them, even if written slightly differently. You may want to try just creating one higher quality page which has all of the information there without duplication.

Another connected point to this, is that different keyword phrases will convert differently for you. Apparently there is evidence to suggest that the main keyword phrase + 2 words will convert the best.

So, for example if your main keyword phrase is “dog training”, then “dog training for labradors” has a higher chance of actually converting than just “dog training”

So, my Google/SEO predictions for the year ahead?

a. I think at some point that exact domain name matching will become less powerful. It just doesn’t seem logical that it should be as powerful as it is. Just because you have a domain with an exact keyword phrase, doesn’t actually mean that you will be the site which delivers to the visitor what they are looking for.

In many (or even most) cases, from an objective point of view this simply will not be the case.
b. Social media will become more and more important for the majority of niches. The fact that you are spending time or money on social media also tells Google that you have some authority in your niche.
c. More and more, we should be giving Google what they want in order to get great positions in the search engines. By putting a larger emphasis on the manual viewing of sites they are showing that if you don’t give them what they want then they will make you suffer.

Either eat it up or lose out…

In conclusion, the vast majority of Google’s revenue comes from advertising. In order to continue and even increase that revenue, they need to do two things:

1. Keep advertisers happy
2. Make sure that searchers continue to use Google in such mass

1. They can keep advertisers happy by making sure that they get targeted visitors to their website and make a positive ROI.

They will not be able to do that if ads are placed on spammy or low quality sites as the visitors to those will likely be lower quality prospects and also will start to trust Google/AdSense less.

(Read that paragraph again – it’s really important)

2. In order to keep searchers using their search engine and clicking on their ads they need to make sure that they are delivering the best possible results.

If you are not ranking, it is unlikely to be that they hate you (or even your website) but more likely that based on the profile that they have of you and your website, you are unlikely to present the best content to the person who is searching for your information.

It is important to keep account of the search engine updates when they are occur, but the overriding factor when deciding your website strategy, is to ensure:

a. You build a site with quality and relevant content
b. You put up content that people will actually want to link to and THEN go about getting the links.

I know I’ve said a lot in this post :)

Do you agree/disagree? Please do leave a comment below.

Especially interested to hear your own predictions on where SEO/Google is moving.

Keeping it real in an unreal world,

Ben Shaffer

PS. Oh yeah…If you could like, share or link to this article that would be great :)

Categories : seo

Comments

  1. Good points here Ben,

    Yes, it is becoming evident that Google is looking harder at Link neighborhoods. What is going to be a challenge moving forward is stopping competitors from putting your website into a bad neighborhood.

    If a black hat SEO person knows that certain back links will hurt your site, what is stopping him from using xrumer and pounding your site w/ bad back links.

    One more area for 2012 is Mobile marketing. Google is investing billions into it and claims it will cover 25% of the searches in 2012. Every website should have mobile companion. This is the next big!

    • Chris says:

      Hi Jeffrey,

      Your 2nd paragraph is a worry to all owners of successful (or semi sucessful websites). I believe unscrupulous people can harm other peoples websites.

      I believe this is even more evident in Adsense sites where competitors can cause multiple fraudulent clicks causing owners to loose their adsense accounts and as most people know, there is no avenue for consulation with Google. Adsense gone… that’s it, thank you very much.

      Good luck in 2012
      Chris

  2. Rich H says:

    Interesting. I have been hearing almost the same info from other sources about the domain name. In fact one group said they had made two hundred sites to test this and found that there was very little difference in results with exact match domain names. I am about to build sites test the waters myself. Thanks for your post it helps to have another opinion to justify my idea to try this test myself.

  3. Chris says:

    Hi Ben,

    I like your breakdown of SEO for 2012. I suppose in some ways it is a logical progression of what has happened in 2011… makes sense (quality is going to be more important than ever).

    I appreciate your ongoing ‘to the point posts’

    Cheers
    Chris

  4. I agree with you SEO is not a jungle. As long as you don’t spam the internet with duplicate content linking back to your site, you are safe with Google. In the end, content is still the king.

  5. Boruch says:

    Valuable points here, Ben.

    Thanks for keeping it logical in an unlogical world.

    Best,

    Boruch

  6. Soni says:

    Hi

    very good point… now big issue for seo software… those making back links for any keywords… in bulk quantity

    that why Google try to change seo software game plan…

    Carry on Google… as seo is not jungle.

    Regards
    Soni

  7. The issue of linking is a real funny one in my view and it is very difficult to sort out the wheat from the chaff. Some say that lots of low quality links are bad and that what you really need are lots of high quality ‘authorative’ links. But hey, would not a site with mostly high quality links also look ‘odd’ in Google’s eyes. Of course this means that you need both types of links (not really news is it), but of course that does mean that all should seek to get some GOOD links as well as generating links via blogs and Social bookmarking etc. The one thing I can report is that despite what some say, lots of low quality links by themselves can often dramatically improve a site’e rankings…

  8. Jon says:

    It should be quiet alarming if what you sat about competitors being able to hurt your site with bad links is true. After all, it’s easier than ever (and cheaper too) to get thousands of low quality links from bad neighborhoods to a site. So even if you are not building any links to your site but it is ranking well, you need to be careful of black hat SEO tactics from the guy who ranks right below you and wants to take you down a few notches.

    I believe there will be a growing trend in website owners testing this theory to lower higher ranking sites and Google will have to do something about it, like simply devaluing these links instead of hurting a website for having them.

  9. Ray says:

    Thanks Ben! Very interesting article. As an affiliate how do you go about building websites that people will actually want to link to or “Like”, or Retweet or Plus one?

    If a website is mainly just a bridge page to the real retailers will people actually find it useful?

    That’s always my question when it comes to social signals. Please advise if you can.

  10. Carlos says:

    Thanks for this information. I’ve seen my articles copied elsewhere, with no attrition, and then linking back to my website. I worry about this both from SEO and bad linking aspects. I feel as if a competitor has done this. After reading your article, it’s clear I will have to address this issue. Any ideas?

  11. Jon says:

    Excellent SEO overview and you make some interesting comments. SEO as a topic tends to be subjective so whenever I read a quality post on the subject I always read through the comments as this provides a variety of views that can be useful.

    I have never bought into any automated backlinking schemes believing them to be unnatural but by the same token Google’s focus on backlinks actually encourages these schemes in the first place so it’s a catch22.

    Of course what Google says and what Google does is seldom the same thing. They claim “quality” content is key yet for almost any search term you will find pages ranking on page#1 that definitely don’t meet that criteria.

    All in all it is a topic that will continue to be debated with no true consensus ever being reached. Each of us must do the best we can with what we’ve got.

  12. In other word, it’s about who knows who on the Internet.

    I think that if a lot of people are talking about a specific website on the Social Network, Google could see that site as an Authority on their field…and probably Google could also try to give them thumbs up for their knowledge!

    If you think about it…that is the reason Google comes with their own G+ Network to spy on conversation, isn’t it?

    Regards,
    Hamilton

  13. Kok Siong says:

    Hi Ben! Thanks for referring me to this post from your email! Yes, I agree with you that the EMD is not so relevant at this moment. The authority of the site determines the ranking in search engine. Sooner or later, mobile marketing will be the next big move for all the webmasters.

  14. Steve says:

    You are right Ben. 2012 should be a year when we create quality content that everyone would like to link to. Social media will come into play more than ever and perhaps define itself further regarding seo, too. I think if we take your advice to heart we will not be raising any flags with the big G and therefore perhaps save our site being inspected more closely by the thousands of “googlers” that G employs over the world to manually check our sites!

  15. Anne Bain says:

    Yes! Yes! and Yes! to all of the above Ben. I know as a ‘searcher’ that I want the best and most closely related information. Great content is king and being socially accepted is becoming paramount to a site’s existence.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting